Institute for Organization Management - A Program of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce

  • About
    • General Information
      • Institute Policies and Procedures
      • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Statement
    • Recruitment Toolkit
    • Prospective Student Toolkit
    • Media
    • Answers to Your Frequently Asked Questions
    • Contact Us
  • Curriculum
    • Core Curriculum
    • Elective Curriculum
    • Webinars & Resource Center
  • Sites & Dates
    • Winter Institute
    • Midwest Institute
    • Southeast Institute
    • Northeast Institute
    • 2023 Institute Schedule
  • Registration
    • Register Now!
    • Deadlines and Fees
    • Scholarships
      • Enrollment Incentives
      • State Partner Scholarship
  • Who’s Who
    • Staff
    • Volunteers
    • Faculty
    • Sponsors
    • Alumni
      • IOM Alumni Database
  • Blog
A PROGRAM OF THE U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION
 

IOM Blog

January 17, 2018

Managing Board Leaks

Nothing is more frustrating than making a decision at a board meeting and by day’s end the members are asking for details.  How did members find out about the discussion just hours after the meeting adjourned?

Equally upsetting is a critical discussion at the board table on a sensitive topic only to find out that one of the directors was texting during the meeting and adversaries have received the guarded information.

The boardroom is intended to be a safe place for confidential discussions.  Directors are responsible for advancing a mission, fulfilling fiduciary roles, and maintaining confidentiality.

Breaching confidentiality might be an innocent slip or a malicious deed.  In either case, an association should address persons who speak wrongly outside the boardroom.    Consider these approaches:

Official Spokesperson

Be sure directors understand that the chief elected officer is the recognized spokesperson.  He or she may delegate authority to staff and others to represent the association.  But no director, committee or volunteer should assume they have authority to speak on behalf of the organization.

Apparent Authority

Apparent authority is a legal principle where persons outside the organization reasonably believe a representative of the association can exercise authority although it may not have been actually granted. Based upon the principle the association can be bound by the inaccurate statements or commitments made by volunteers.

 Corporate Law

Directors must understand they are trustees of an organization governed by state law.   Authority and limits are prescribed by corporate law.  Speaking without explicit authority may be an infraction.

Stick to the Script

 Directors may be approached with questions from the media, government officials or others who take their word as fact.   In that case, stick to a script.   Know the mission, goals and official positions of the association.  Develop an “elevator speech.”   Avoid disclosing what should remain confidential.

Duty of Loyalty

One of the fiduciary principles is duty of loyalty.  The duty has three key components: (1) the director must not use opportunities for personal gain, (2) must avoid engaging in transactions without board approval, and (3) must maintain the organization’s confidential information.

 Established Policy

Document who has authority to speak.   A policy may state, “Nobody may usurp the authority of the chief elected officer, or his or her designees, to represent the organization.”

 Director Orientation

Offer directors an annual orientation about responsibilities, relationships and risks.  The executive director or an attorney should make it clear who speaks for the association.

Organizational Chart

 An org-chart depicts lines of communication and hierarchy.   Directors should respect lines of communication, recognizing there are persons responsible for certain duties.

Ground Rules

Boards often establish ground rules outside the requirements specified in bylaws and policies.  The ground rules might include starting on time, respecting volunteers and staff, expectations of guests in attendance, and advising that all discussions and handouts are confidential.

Commitment Form

 A commitment form for directors is recommended.   It requires a signature to affirm understanding of topics such as confidentiality, conflicts of interest and anti-competitive acts.

 Agree to Disagree

 Discussions in board meetings can be robust.  Not everyone will agree on the decisions.  But the only thing board members should state after the meeting is, “I support the decisions of the board.”  Opinions should be voiced in the meeting, not after the meeting.

Digital Trail

A person who breaches confidentiality by posting on social media or emailing should realize a digital trail exists that will be hard to deny.

Social Media Posting

Adopt a policy.   While directors may post on the association’s social media, there should be a policy they may not contradict already approved official votes and positions, and must include a disclaimer that they are expressing their personal opinion and not that of the association.

Stationery

Providing volunteers with stationery or business cards might imply they have full authority to speak for the organization.  Adopt a policy on official use of letterhead and an understanding that it may not be used by volunteers, committees and chapters. Most organizations restrict use of letterhead to the staff and do not provide business cards to volunteers.

Board Censure

If infractions continue the board should address the problem.  By a motion of the board they may express disapproval or censure the director’s behavior.

The most common question amongst executive directors is how to handle volunteers who disrespect confidentiality.   It is the role of the chief elected officer to approach directors who leak information.   When and if it is the chief elected officer breaching confidentiality, the executive officers should resolve the problem.

While it is difficult to “fire” a volunteer, there are times when breaching confidentiality and causing risk outweighs the value of a volunteer.

 

Avatar photo
Bob Harris, CAE
President
NonProfitCenter.com

There are more than one million nonprofit organizations in the USA. Bob has studied thousands of them to develop best practices. He started his career in Washington D.C. working with Presidential Classroom. He went on to build an association management company in Tallahassee, FL. He is on the faculty for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation. He has worked in Amman, Jordan, Tokyo, Japan and Minsk, Belarus to help organizations. He received “Association Partner of the Year” award from Association Trends Magazine in 2012. He has authored books on association management. To improve management he created the Association Self-Auditing Process, used by more than 20,000 organizations. He believes that nonprofit organizations should be as efficient as any commercial business. He’s been dubbed the “Martha Stewart of association management” for providing tips and templates for making management easier. These are available free on his website at www.nonprofitcenter.com.

Note:  Bob Harris, CAE, provides free association and governance tips, articles and templates at www.nonprofitcenter.com

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
DONATE NOW!
UPDATE CONTACT INFO
Sign-up for Emails
Approved Provider

About

  • General Information
  • Contact Us
  • Curriculum
  • Prospective Student Toolkit

Sites & Dates

  • Winter Institute
  • Midwest Institute
  • Southeast Institute
  • Northeast Institute

Resources

  • Scholarships
  • Faculty
  • Sponsors
  • Update Contact Info
  • Volunteers

Follow IOM

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
IOM Blog

Institute for Organization Management - A program of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce © 2023 | Privacy Policy